Archive for December, 2009

It Was the Best of Times, It Was the Worst of Times…

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to heaven, we were all going direct the other way – in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.”

- A Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens

Decades from now, when we look back at the book business in 2009, it seems likely that we’ll see it as a threshold year, one in which all of the signs were there for what followed. It was a year in which sales held steady (Nielsen Bookscan, which covers 75% of the market, reported that overall unit sales through December 20 were 724 million copies, only a 3% drop from last year—and adult hardcover fiction was up an amazing 3%), and a few authors were so successful (Stephanie Meyer, Jeff Kinney) that the fates of entire publishing houses were altered by them; however, it was also a year that saw publishing’s profit margins squeezed in perplexing new ways. It was a year in which some of the most highly-respected bestsellers (Audrey Niffenegger’s Her Fearful Symmetry; Andre Agassi’s Open; Edward M. Kennedy’s True Compass) were also apparently the year’s biggest money-losers for their publishers, due to their multi-million-dollar advances; at the same time, some of the books with the highest rumored advances (Dan Brown’s The Lost Symbol; Sarah Palin’s Going Rogue) were likely the most profitable. It was a year in which e-book sales increased exponentially, with the cherry on the sundae being Amazon’s announcement that they had sold more e-books on Christmas Day than p-books (though of course this was helped by all the people who got Kindles as presents and spent the day filling them); but it was also a year in which the prices charged for those e-books made them a threat to the health of the p-book retailers on whom publishers continued to rely, and possibly a future threat to publishers’ ability to make money on the e-book format itself, in spite of that format’s wonderful ability to eliminate the costs of production, distribution, and returns. It was a year in which the largest publishing houses slowed title acquisitions and reduced the number of titles they published, while one company—Author Solutions—increased its annual output to a remarkable 24,000 authors (even more remarkably, these authors were all paying for the privilege). It was a year in which review coverage of new fiction disappeared almost entirely, and yet one first novel (Kathryn Stockett’s The Help) sold more than a million hardcover copies thanks to word of mouth alone. It was a year in which publishers continued to spend exorbitant amounts of money on print advertising, in spite of data showing how ineffective such advertising tends to be, but also a year in which some publishers discovered the power of online media to reach niche markets at significantly lower costs.

What does this mean for the future? That for every trend there will be a counter trend. And since this is the time of year for Top Ten lists, here’s mine:

1. Trend: The large publishing houses will continue to reduce overhead as profits shrink in the years ahead. Counter trend: Publishers will be looking for mergers and acquisitions to compensate for those shrinking profits. The Big Six could be the Big Three within five years.

2. Trend: These companies will continue to focus more resources on fewer titles, using their strengths as large-scale marketers and distributors to publish brand-names. Title count at the largest houses could drop by as much as fifty percent over the next five years. Counter trend: At the same time, self-publishing (including partnerships like the one announced recently between Author Solutions and Harlequin) will grow exponentially.

3. Trend: Title reduction will be most significant for new talent, with the largest houses entrusting support of new authors to a handful of editorial imprints. The editors at those imprints–editors with proven ability to choose new material successfully–will increase in value. Counter trend: Editors whose job is to handle existing talent will find their roles diminished.

4. Trend: In terms of advances, the amounts paid for brand-names will continue to increase, with seven-figure or eight-figure acquisitions commonplace among authors with established track records. Counter trend: There will be an increase in five-figure acquisitions (perhaps with profit-share arrangements) for less predictable material. The six-figure advance—that dangerous neighborhood inhabited by books with lots of potential but few guarantees—will become a rare species within the decade.

5. Trend: E-book sales will grow exponentially, with the proliferation of new devices and applications for reading on smartphones, etc… Within five years, half of all reading will be done electronically. Counter trend: There will be a resurgence of appreciation for well-designed physical books, as keepsakes, gifts, etc… While e-books will create a downward pressure on pricing, there will be notable exceptions (as seen this year with Carl Jung’s The Red Book, in great demand at $195.00, or Thomas Keller’s gorgeous Ad Hoc at Home, a bestseller at $50.00).

6. Trend: As more consumers become e-book readers, demand will increase for the availability of e-books simultaneously with p-books. Counter trend: Publishers will try a variety of strategies to meet this demand while not undercutting their p-book sales, such as offering more expensive “enhanced” e-books at publication and plain vanilla, less expensive e-books several months later (the strategy recently announced by Macmillan) or by offering a variety of “bundled” discounts to purchasers of multiple formats (prediction: within five years, it will be common practice to give every p-book purchaser a “free” e-book version of that book at time of purchase, as is already the case in the music business, in which someone who buys a cd can also listen to that cd on other devices in digital form, without paying a separate fee).

7. Trend: Fewer and fewer books will be sold to publishers at “auction,” and that practice will disappear completely within five years, as more and more publishers realize that the “winner” in such auctions—the publisher willing to pay more to acquire a book than any of their competitors–is often actually the loser in the end. Sales will be made either by brand-name authors to their previous publishing company or by new authors to carefully chosen editors with strong reputations. Counter trend: Instead of auctions for the highest advance, there will be auctions in which a basic advance is established by the agent, with the auction winner being the publisher who bids the most in marketing committed to the book.

8. Trend: As the initial sale becomes less of the focus for authors, the agent of the future will become more of a business manager who handles every aspect of an author’s career, overseeing the author’s online presence, developing sources of revenue outside of book sales such as workshops and lecture tours, and acting as the author’s publicist in between publications. Counter trend: Publishers will create free-standing departments whose services can be purchased a la carte by authors, whether that author is self-published or published by a competitor who doesn’t offer such services.

9. Trend: As the Boomers lose their eyesight and their children become teenagers, demographics will favor books for young adults over books for adults. This is also the generation most likely to embrace a variety of online and offline formats, without feeling the need to choose one over another. Counter trend: While auctions and advances diminish for adult titles, they could heat up for young adult material as publishers bet big in search of the next Stephenie Meyer. (Prediction: publishing houses will soon have entire departments devoted to developing books about the undead.)

10. Trend: Every year for the foreseeable future, books will be purchased between Thanksgiving and Christmas about how to prepare high-calorie foods (a favorite from this year: Fat: An Appreciation of a Misunderstood Ingredient, by Jennifer McLagan). Counter trend: Every January for the foreseeable future, the bestseller lists will be dominated by books about how to lose the weight gained by eating those high-calorie foods. (Not much of a prediction, sorry…but I needed a tenth trend to complete the list!)

Share This Post


 

Kevin Connolly on the TODAY show: “I’ve not really had any sense of loss”

At the end of this morning’s TODAY show segment on Kevin Connolly’s book Double Take, Meredith Vieira asks, “I know you’re pretty much unflappable but the one thing that makes you cringe is when people call you an inspiration. Whyis that?” Watch to hear Kevin’s unquestionably inspirational answer. (Sorry Kev, you ARE an inspiration.)

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Share This Post

Comments Off


 

The Ultimate Book Worm’s Gift List

Nina Sankovitch, the author of Tolstoy and the Purple Chair, has compiled a fabulous gift list for all the readers in your life: The runner: What I Talk About When I Talk about Running by Haruki Murakami; The Optimist: On Kindness by Adam Phillips and Barbara Taylor; The Teenager: The Love of the Last Tycoon by F. Scott Fitzgerald. For the full list click here.

Share This Post

Comments Off


 

An Argument for Looking at Books Instead of Reading Them

Not sure whether to laugh, cry, or applaud at Andy Spade’s new installation.

(via Suite 2046)

Share This Post


 

E-Readers Vs. Unicorns

I really enjoyed this video from Bonnier, a Swedish magazine publisher, demonstrating their vision for a magazine e-reader tablet. Bonnier’s design team at BERG concepted an interface that really compliments how we read both physical and digital material, choosing such elements like visual page markers that make you more aware of your position within the material and scrolling systems for navigation, made possible by a full touch screen. It looks promising for the next generation of e-readers, and I can’t imagine that the technology needed to materialize these ideas is far behind.

But Robert Andrews over at paidContent.org makes an excellent argument against e-readers, as enhanced as they will become:

“Personally, I’m not convinced any of these single-function gadgets – whether for books or magazines – will be particularly successful. iPhone has succeeded because it’s not a walled garden; ereaders need more than both books and magazines.

Apple and Microsoft are rumoured to be working on multi-functional devices – it’s here, if anywhere, that tablets may really come in to their own, as near-computers, not slabs that mimic individual olde worlde media.”

The problem with the dedicated e-reader is that it’s dedicated, and I personally can’t justify spending money on something that limited when an iPhone can do more for less. Engadget already reported that the Nook has been hacked to include a web browser and Pandora (as well as other apps) proving the desire for a device to be more than multiple books. The Apple tablet (or the Unicorn, as Kassia Krozser calls it) won’t save publishing, but it will convert many more people to e-books than e-readers can.

Share This Post


 

Suit Up Your Books

Book City Jackets, a Brooklyn-based company, designs and sells these lovely brown paper book jackets. Their motto? Make every book beautiful. We couldn’t agree more.

Book City Jackets
Share This Post


 

Publishers Weekly Have You Lost Your Mind?

I found the cover of this week’s Publishers Weekly disturbing. Am I the only one?

PW cover 12-14-09
Share This Post


 

Less Is More

Thomas L. Friedman (Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times)In “The Do-It-Yourself Economy” in yesterday’s New York Times, Tom Friedman wrote about how the “Great Recession” was forcing companies to take advantage of the “Great Inflection,” his name for “the mass diffusion of low-cost, high-powered innovation technologies,” giving a powerful example of a recently downsized marketing agency that had made a film for 20 percent less using online technology. There is a clear message for book publishers here as well, who have not only experienced a recent downturn in sales that led to layoffs across the industry, but also face a future in which e-book pricing will inevitably bring down revenues through traditional models in the years ahead. The “good news,” as Friedman calls it, is that technology has arrived that lets us move more quickly, with less cost and a smaller staff. We all need to find ways each day to embrace it–or be victims of the “Recession” without the “Inflection” that might save us.

Share This Post

Comments Off


 

A Great Holiday Gift Idea

Last week I had the pleasure of meeting with Caroline Vanderlip, the CEO of a company called SharedBook. Among the many fabulous things SharedBook can do, is personalize a book for a customer. The process for the publisher is crazy easy: I gave her the file and the jacket, we decided upon a price, and voila, Crush It! by Gary Vaynerchuk was available a day later as a personalized option for customers in time for the holidays.

Personalized Crush It! from SharedBook

On the customer end, I went in and clicked to buy the book, uploaded a photo, wrote a message, and the book is now being sent to me. Free Shipping. Really seamless and lovely shopping experience.

How can this not be the biggest thing in book publishing since sliced bread? Wouldn’t everyone who’s giving a book as a gift want the opportunity to to personalize it for the recipient? I plan on trying many more of these!

As an aside, SharedBook can also seamlessly bring a blog to a book format. Check it out here.

Share This Post


 

Is Staggering Hardcover/E-book Pub Dates a Long-Term Solution?

Kyle Bean's "The Future of the Book"As much as I love hardcovers and print books in general, I understand why e-book readers are frustrated about Simon & Schuster and Hachette’s announcement on delayed e-book releases. In an attempt to “preserve our industry,” both houses are (or plan on) publishing e-book editions of their titles three to four months after the hardcover release. The idea is that readers will end up paying the higher price for the book in hardcover because they won’t want to wait four months for the book in their preferred format. Most authors at those houses are on board with the plan because they stand to make more money from hardcover sales, but that’s only if people are equally inclined to buy either format but make decisions based on price alone.

If they are, then I understand why you would delay e-book releases to remove the competition for hardcover sales. But it seems that a majority of e-book readers, who have spent the couple of hundred dollars on an electronic reading device, are rather dedicated to the format and wouldn’t let a timing delay convince them to spend extra money on a hardcover. In those four months, they would spend their $9.99 on other books (and you know there are plenty out there to choose from) and possibly forget about the delayed titles by the time they’re available. As an Amazon spokesman said in the Wall Street Journal article, “Authors get the most publicity at launch and need to strike while the iron is hot. If readers can’t get their preferred format at that moment, they may buy a different book or just not buy a book at all.”

James McQuivey over at the Forrester blog posted a great response to the announcement, proposing alternatives to the delayed e-book plan, including bundling the formats and offering premium digital editions that can be released at the same time as hardcovers. We’ve discovered some challenges with bundling formats and putting the physical and digital into the same shopping cart, but we’re still working on finding solutions that won’t keep any readers out in the cold.

Share This Post